As a engineer, I have been studying and following the debt and development of renewable energy sources for more than 30 years, and many useful and useless solutions / solutions have crossed the path of discovery.
One of the tendencies that always seems to stand out is the whole or no approach.
All wind energy, or all nuclear energy, or all waves, sun, etc. And every hydrogen, it is rarely ever a complex / combination of current conventional and renewable energy sources.
The latest fashions again look at all the atoms or hydrogen, and the most ridiculous are "carbon capture".
CO2 compression for pumping into the ocean's bottom or geological cavity is the cost of energy consumption, such as building and discharging nuclear power plants and storing radioactive waste and is equally dangerous.
Using biofuels, with the current technology, is a bit like burning breakfast, lunch and dinner to drive the car.
It is even more interesting that these latest offers can not be realized for another 10 to 30 years and require a large amount of funding to prove or refute their responsibility. So it seems that you always support concepts that are not used immediately when abundant and proven concepts are realized now, taking into account the immediate benefits.
Methods such as joint production (waste heat utilization) or the preheating of renewable energy sources are rarely mentioned. Both methods are just a few of the many options that guarantee a substantial reduction in fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
Again, hydrogen as a fuel dispute is all or no approach. It is not new that wagons (and aircraft) can run on hydrogen. The catch here is the cost of fuel storage and non-existing infrastructure. They even suggest that hydrogen is generated, you think, coal-based fuels or nuclear energy.
We are just wondering why they are so seldom regarded as viable and relatively low cost modification of existing means of transport. The conversion of petrol-powered vehicles to LPG / CNG has been economically viable and has been supporting the reduction of greenhouse gases for many years.
Hybrid cars that can be operated by combustion of internal combustion engines, batteries and electric motors are another, but it may still be very expensive to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
So why not use hydrogen with conventional fuel to reduce fuel consumption and environmental footprint? It's a proven technology. The low cost on-board hydrogen generator produces a small amount of hydrogen as a combustion enhancer. This hydrogen generator works only when the engine is running, perfectly safe, saves a significant amount of fuel and does not require any hydrogen storage. In other words, hydrogen is not produced if the engine does not work.
Source by visit sbobet thailand